{"id":2682,"date":"2012-04-05T14:54:28","date_gmt":"2012-04-05T20:54:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/valleywatch.net\/?p=2682"},"modified":"2012-04-05T15:29:58","modified_gmt":"2012-04-05T21:29:58","slug":"community-groups-file-lawsuit-for-federal-coal-ash-protections","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/valleywatch.net\/?p=2682","title":{"rendered":"Community Groups File Lawsuit for Federal Coal Ash Protections"},"content":{"rendered":"

April 5, 2012-by Jared Saylor, Earthjustice<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

Coal ash ponds and landfills lie adjacent to both a residential community and the Ohio River at Louisville Gas and Electric's Cane Run pose plant in west Lousiville, KY. The ash has been a source of friction between neighbors and the company for a long time. Now the plant is slated for retirement but the ash might remain a problem forever. Photo \u00a9 2010 John Blair.<\/p><\/div>\n

Environmental and public health groups\u00a0will file a lawsuit today in the U.S. District Court, District of Columbia,<\/a>\u00a0to force the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to complete its rulemaking process and finalize public health safeguards against toxic coal ash. Although the EPA has not updated its waste disposal and control standards for coal ash in over thirty years, it continues to delay these needed federal protections despite more evidence of leaking waste ponds, poisoned groundwater supplies and threats to public health. The groups\u2019 lawsuit comes as EPA data show that an additional 29 power plants in 16 states have contaminated groundwater near coal ash dump sites.<\/p>\n

\n

Earthjustice is suing the agency under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) on behalf of Appalachian Voices (NC), Environmental Integrity Project, Chesapeake Climate Action Network (MD), French Broad Riverkeeper (NC), Kentuckians For The Commonwealth (KY), Moapa Band of Paiutes (NV), Montana Environmental Information Center (MT), Physicians for Social Responsibility, Prairie Rivers Network (IL), Sierra Club and Southern Alliance for Clean Energy (TN). RCRA requires the EPA to ensure that safeguards are regularly updated to address threats posed by wastes, but the EPA has never revised the safeguards to ensure that they address coal ash. Coal ash is the byproduct of coal-fired power plants, and includes a toxic mix of arsenic, lead, hexavalent chromium, mercury, selenium, cadmium and other dangerous pollutants.<\/p>\n

The EPA\u2019s data about\u00a0groundwater contamination at 29 additional sites<\/a>\u00a0came as a result of a 2010 questionnaire the agency sent to approximately 700 fossil- and nuclear-fueled power plants in an effort to collect data on water discharges. The questionnaire collected general plant information and also required a subset of coal-fired power plants to collect and analyze samples of leachate from coal ash dump sites and report exceedances of toxic chemicals in groundwater monitored by the plants. The Environmental Integrity Project filed a Freedom of Information Act request to obtain the data. After analysis by Earthjustice and EIP, according to the facilities\u2019 own monitoring data, 29 sites had coal ash contaminants in groundwater, including arsenic, lead and other pollutants. Contamination was found at plants in 16 states, with multiple new cases in Texas (3), North Carolina (3), Colorado (2), South Carolina (2), Pennsylvania (2), Iowa (3), and West Virginia (5), among others.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

A cloud of highly toxic coal ash is seen blowing like a sandstorm straight at the homes on the Moapa River Reservation. (Photo by Moapa Band of Paiutes)<\/p><\/div>\n

Today\u2019s lawsuit would force the EPA to set deadlines for review and revision of relevant solid and hazardous waste safeguards to address coal ash, as well as the much needed, and long overdue changes to the test that determines whether a waste is hazardous under RCRA.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe numbers of coal ash ponds and landfills that are contaminating water supplies continues to grow, yet nearby communities still do not have effective federal protection,\u201d said Earthjustice attorney Lisa Evans. \u201cIt is well past time the EPA acts on promises made years ago to protect the nation from coal ash contamination and life-threatening coal ash ponds.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cIt is a fact that all of Duke and Progress Energies’ coal ash ponds are leaching toxic heavy metals into groundwater,\u201d said Sandra Diaz of Appalachian Voices. \u201cHow long must the people of North Carolina wait for the EPA to do its job to protect us from the threat that coal ash poses to our health?\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cRight now our organization is involved in several lawsuits against old, leaking coal ash landfills in Maryland,\u201d said Diana Dascalu-Joffe, staff attorney with Chesapeake Climate Action Network. \u201cDangerous coal ash is leaching into waterways that hurt the Chesapeake Bay and could be threatening the health of Maryland citizens. The EPA has a responsibility to issue a strong rule to address coal ash so groups like ours don\u2019t have to fight to clean them up, facility by facility, at the state level. That is why CCAN is involved in this federal RCRA deadline lawsuit\u2014to force EPA\u2019s hand on the coal ash rule. They have been delaying this essential rule that will protect public health and the environment for far too long.\u201d<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

Cleanup operations of the TVA Kingston coal ash spill. (TVA)<\/p><\/div>\n

\u201cThree decades since EPA last reviewed the coal ash disposal standards and over three years since the TVA Kingston spill, citizens still lack basic protections from dumping of toxic ash,\u201d said Eric Schaeffer, Executive Director of the Environmental Integrity Project. \u201cMeanwhile, toxic dumping continues to rise: in 2010 alone, power plants used unsafe and leak-prone coal ash ponds to dispose of wastes containing 113.6 million pounds of toxic metals, a nearly ten percent increase from 2009. Yet EPA\u2019s proposed standards for safe disposal, including a plan to close down ash ponds within five years, have gone nowhere.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cOne of the biggest threats to our clean water is coal ash pollution,\u201d explains French Broad Riverkeeper, Hartwell Carson. \u201cMonitoring at Progress Energy\u2019s two coal ash ponds in Asheville, North Carolina, shows chronic groundwater pollution concerns and the community around the plant has repeatedly complained about fugitive coal ash dust coating their homes. We need the EPA to act to protect human health and the environment.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cHere in Louisville, Kentucky, we are having problems with dust discharges from one of our big coal-burning power plants,\u201d said Mary Love of Kentuckians for the Commonwealth. \u201cOur local Air Pollution Control District is doing what it can to force the power company to keep our air safe to breathe, but without federal standards on the hazards of coal ash, there is only so much they can do.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cOur air, our health and our culture is under attack by pollution from nearby coal wastewater ponds,\u201d said William Anderson, chairman of the Moapa Band of Paiutes in southeastern Nevada. \u201cWe once hunted geese and ducks on our land, but no longer. These birds are being poisoned by the water in the coal ash ponds. We once harvested medicinal plants, but not any more. Soils are contaminated by the power plant\u2019s coal ash dust, soot and other pollutants. We are being forced to bear the burden of dirty power for Nevada.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cIn the West, water is a scarce commodity. It\u2019s EPA\u2019s job to protect it from contamination,\u201d said Anne Hedges, Program Director of the Montana Environmental Information Center. \u201cThey are failing to do their job at Colstrip where ground and surface waters are already contaminated with coal ash waste. It\u2019s time for EPA to step up and protect the lives and livelihoods of people who live near this enormous facility.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cCoal ash is severely and dangerously toxic. The heavy metals it contains are contaminating ground water supplies and drinking wells, as well as air and farmland. It’s time that we bring this serious health hazard under control. As physicians and health professionals, we strongly endorse nationwide health-protective rules for coal ash disposal,\u201d noted Barbara Gottlieb, director for Environment & Health, Physicians for Social Responsibility.<\/p>\n

\u201cWhen lead was discovered to be hazardous, it was taken out of paint and gasoline. When asbestos was discovered to be dangerous, we stopped using it in our building materials. Now that the scientific evidence is in, we know coal ash is a harmful material and needs to be disposed of as such,\u201d said Traci Barkley, water resources scientist with Prairie Rivers Network. \u201cThe EPA must not delay their responsibility to protect people and the environment\u2014federal regulations on coal ash are needed now.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cCoal ash poses a very real health risk to families and communities around the country,\u201d said Mary Anne Hitt, Director of the Sierra Club’s Beyond Coal Campaign. \u201cIt’s time the EPA put in place strong protections that address the threats communities affected by coal ash have been facing for decades. We’ve been waiting for these standards since the disastrous TVA coal ash spill in 2008, and it’s time for action. The EPA needs to put these common-sense protections in place to keep this toxic pollution out of our rivers, lakes and streams.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cIt has been over two years since EPA started the coal ash rulemaking process and over three years since the Kingston disaster and still we have no comprehensive safeguards\u201d said Josh Galperin, policy analyst and research attorney with the Southern Alliance for Clean Energy. \u201cIf you ignore the growing problem of coal ash contamination and the people at risk for future disasters you could chalk this up to bureaucratic delay. Looking at the big picture, however, and despite federal laws requiring frequent review, it has been 30 years since EPA last addressed ash contamination. The people who drink, fish, swim, boat, play or live around water cannot wait any longer.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Contact:<\/strong>Jared Saylor, Earthjustice, (202) 745-5213<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

April 5, 2012-by Jared Saylor, Earthjustice Environmental and public health groups\u00a0will file a lawsuit today in the U.S. District Court, District of Columbia,\u00a0to force the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to complete its rulemaking process and finalize public health safeguards against … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[25,20,33,171,112,28],"class_list":["post-2682","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-coal","tag-coal-ash","tag-epa","tag-law-suit","tag-lge","tag-pollution"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/valleywatch.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2682","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/valleywatch.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/valleywatch.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/valleywatch.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/valleywatch.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2682"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"http:\/\/valleywatch.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2682\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2684,"href":"http:\/\/valleywatch.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2682\/revisions\/2684"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/valleywatch.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2682"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/valleywatch.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2682"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/valleywatch.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2682"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}